Posted by: pastortomtypes | September 25, 2007

What price - Academic Freedom?

No doubt you’ve heard in the news about President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad speaking at Colombia University in New York.    I read an article from the New York Times today on line that was praising the President of Colombia for having the courage to support the Iranian President’s right to speak here in the US.   Having worked in Higher Education for over 20 years I often came face to face with both sides of the Academic Freedom debate.  Today, when I was watching the news and reading the paper it all came flooding back in the form of the question I raise in my title:  What price - academic freedom? 

 You see, I agree that our right to free speech is quaranteed and SHOULD be guaranteed and preserved by our Constitution.  I also believe that in a free society varying views on conroversial subjects should be allowed to be heard.  The only problem comes when we try to live by the letter of the law and not the spirit of the law.  When we emphatically support ALL free speech - no matter how controversial - we conveniently forget that it is impossible to be totally consistent.  The proof is that in a free society we still have some absolute values that we impose on all our citizens that may disregard their rights to free speech.  For example; you can not use your free speech to yell “fire” in a crowded theatre without punishment of imprisonment.  Perhaps a better example would be that the same institutions that exhault academic freedom under our constitutional rights would also ban what they call “hate speech”.  Hate speech has been interpreted to include any pro-life speech and any anti-homosexual speech.  Christians have long been the targets of liberal academic censors who would silence Christian beliefs and views on the grounds that they are “intolerant.”  

So,  when I see the President of Columbia  University standing his ground on international television I think it somewhat lacking in integrity and truth.  At best it is hypocritical.  At worst it is extremely dangerous to our very national security.   Why is it so dangerous?  Because allowing this known terrorist to freely air his views on our land and in our schools, is in some way saying that his hate-filled, inhuman views may be correct in some people’s minds.   On other issues we have come out clearly saying that certain views are NOT acceptable to be aired.  This terroist’s views fall clearly in that category and no policy on academic freedom - no matter how liberal - should ever be allowed to be misinterpreted to protect the right of a madman to spew his hatred and make a mockery of everything we stand for as a free nation.    The President of Columbia and all who agree with him should be ashamed of themselves and should beg for forgiveness of all those Americans whom they have offended by their liberal elitist thinking.  They do not speak for freedom of speech, they speak for their own liberal agenda and their over inflated intellectual snobbery.    Intellectualism without moral restraints makes robots out of men and women with the best of our intellect as the final word.  Well, I believe we are humans, made in the image of God, whom I believe is the author of our moral codes and biblical values that this country was founded on. 

Responses

man, controversial debates/talks are so exciteing!

I am glad you wrote again…Sally T.

Pastor Tom,

I had another take on the Columbia President’s approach. I was really encouraged by his honesty–he confronted the Iranian diplomat straight on–signaling to all the students and others present by his confrontation that honesty trumps “tact”, and that we all have a moral duty to “speak the truth” to our world.

He could have just been “polite” but he chose integrity in his introduction. That counts big time for me. So many of us choose “mercy” over admonition and it almost never bears righteous fruit. See the excerpt below.

“Mr. Ahmadinejad faced stinging words before he even spoke, from the very man who had invited him.

“Mr. President, you exhibit all the signs of a petty, cruel dictator,” said Columbia University Preident Lee Bollinger during the introduction.

Mr. Ahmadinejad later chastised Bollinger for what the Iranian leader called his “insults” and ‘unfriendly treatment.’”

http://www.voanews.com/english/2007-09-25-voa31.cfm

I don’t believe he should have spoken at the school. It felt like the school was supporting terrorism on some level. While our country gives our citizens free speech, I don’t feel someone who hates our country so much should be granted this right while in our country. It was good to see that our officials didn’t attend this highly debatable appearance. That spoke volumes in trying to protect their own integrity. I don’t feel; however, that those at Columbia were in the right insulting this man from the get go, since he was their invited guest. Well, what’s done is done. We can only hope that irreparable damage won’t follow from this event.

Leave a response

Your response:

Categories